In "34 Years Later, Supreme Court Will Revisit Eyewitness IDs," the New York Times takes a look at Perry v. New Hampshire, the science on eyewitness identification, and wrongful convictions. The story says that since 1977, the last case in which the Supreme Court addressed eyewitness testimony, "the scientific understanding of human memory has been transformed" by more than 2,000 studies on the topic. Legal observers, including the Innocence Project's Barry Scheck, worry that the limits of the case will mean that the Court will not go far enough to reflect what we've learned about human memory.