That's the message of a study described in today's New York Times of every question and answer in every U.S. Supreme Court nominee confirmation hearing since 1939. According to the Times, the study "shows that the hearings often address real substance, illuminate the spirit of their times and change with shifts in partisan alignments and the demographic characteristics of nominees."
Other State Bar Resources
- e-Journal (subscribe to the daily publication)
- Michigan Bar Journal (monthly)
- Practice Management Resource Center
- Public Policy Update (every Monday)
- SBM 21st Century Practice Task Force
- SBM Best Legal Future Blog
- SBM NewsLinks (a daily newsletter with law-related news headlines)
- Virtual Court (videos of latest Michigan Supreme Court oral arguments and conference)
Regular Reads
Categories
- American Bar Association News
- Economics of Legal Practice
- Ethics
- General Interest
- Global Legal News
- In Memoriam
- Judicial Crossroads Task Force
- Just Because
- Law School
- Lawyers Making News
- Legal Humor
- Michigan Supreme Court
- National Legal News
- Neighbors
- Now and Then
- Opening Doors
- Perspectives
- Practice Management
- SBM's Got Talent!
- State Bar of Michigan News
- State Legal News
- Tech Stuff
- Tremors
- U.S. Supreme Court
Search
Recent Posts
- Judicial Vacancy—Charlevoix County
- Family Law Section Annual Meeting
- SBM Business Law Section to Host Business Boot Camp Nov. 4-5, 2019 in Grand Rapids, Jan. 30-31 in Plymouth
- Agricultural Law Section Annual Meeting
- NCBE Testing Task Force 2019 Practice Analysis
- Human Trafficking Training on October 17
- Judicial Vacancy—36th District Court
- Information Technology Law Section Seminar & Annual Meeting
- Alternative Dispute Resolution Section Annual Meeting and Conference
- Young Lawyers Section Lunch & Learn—Tips & Tricks for Administrative Hearings & Appeals