That's the message of a study described in today's New York Times of every question and answer in every U.S. Supreme Court nominee confirmation hearing since 1939. According to the Times, the study "shows that the hearings often address real substance, illuminate the spirit of their times and change with shifts in partisan alignments and the demographic characteristics of nominees."
Other State Bar Resources
- e-Journal (subscribe to the daily publication)
- Michigan Bar Journal (monthly)
- Practice Management Resource Center
- Public Policy Update (every Monday)
- SBM 21st Century Practice Task Force
- SBM Best Legal Future Blog
- SBM NewsLinks (a daily newsletter with law-related news headlines)
- Virtual Court (videos of latest Michigan Supreme Court oral arguments and conference)
Regular Reads
Categories
- American Bar Association News
- Economics of Legal Practice
- Ethics
- General Interest
- Global Legal News
- In Memoriam
- Judicial Crossroads Task Force
- Just Because
- Law School
- Lawyers Making News
- Legal Humor
- Michigan Supreme Court
- National Legal News
- Neighbors
- Now and Then
- Opening Doors
- Perspectives
- Practice Management
- SBM's Got Talent!
- State Bar of Michigan News
- State Legal News
- Tech Stuff
- Tremors
- U.S. Supreme Court
Search
Recent Posts
- Third Annual Fundamentals of Taxation Boot Camp
- Civil Discovery Guidebook Available
- Free Civil Discovery On-Demand Seminar
- "Tips and Tools" for a Successful Practice Seminar
- Business Boot Camp I: Basic Training for Every Business Lawyer
- Lawyer Trust Accounts Seminar: Management Principles & Recordkeeping Resources
- Michigan Supreme Court Appoints New Grievance Administrator
- NCBE Testing Task Force 2019 Practice Analysis
- Annual Information Technology Seminar & Annual Meeting
- New Civil Discovery Rules Resources